ACADEMIC JARGON

Postmodern literature has been commonly considered a peculiar phenomenon strongly associated with the surprisingly and intensely self-conscious (or, to use another fashionable critical term, ‘reflexive’) study of the building of the understanding of the dialectic to establish that discourses are not conjunctural in outcome. To improve the quality of this study, a new project has begun, whose currency comprises units of metaphor, synecdoche, and metonymy, consisting, typically, in the trans-factual efficacy of the generative mechanism of structures, the rhythmic temporality as well as spaciality, in the quest of a speed older than time and space, which are the derivative of the holistic causality and intra-activity of a (in general) partial totality, dependent in the human sphere upon the ontological. I have prioritized the triunity of space, time and causality; stressed the fivefold causal chain irreducibly tensing the spatializing, processual exercise of their causal powers, potentially mediated by necessarily binary or polarized spheres which are necessarily in apposition to each other. This book advances the claim that the dialectics are best understood as the substitution instances, occupying argument places in a schema formed in the interstices and engaging postcolonial and feminist perspectives for a multicultural epistemological pedagogy. This is foundational, for the study, irreducibly rhetorical, is the product of a fluid tropology. The following work aims to establish that the organized inorganic structures of the dialectic are necessary for the construction of all meaning and reality and takes itself as its only real subject. Not a decomposition of speed, life is the conquest of mobility; the structure of the bricolage conforms in many ways to the phenomenological analysis of the works of meta-fiction. This is one argument, used to designate the function that willfully (and perhaps perversely) subverts the premise that what we traditionally consider ontological, normative, or art as a privileged locus of disclosure of the horizontal structure of human experience into meetly meted prose which messalinically mimics a metrazolic mirage magnifying our culture’s metonymic, onanistic calculus, is centered on the dialectic. In particular, this argument reinforces that what the dialectic demonstrates is the initially immanent status of the representation of our understanding, without thereby driving the de-fault of origin out of which there is time - constitutive (in the strict phenomenological sense). In this preface, the epistomologist, just awakened from his dogmatic slumbers, into the exile of phenomenalism, describes the attempted metonymy of linking being with history in a mimetic illusion of stories, which calls attention to its own artiface, and ultimately, in treating itself as a paradigm of epistemological tenets and mannerisms of poststructuralist (especially deconstructive) literary theory embodied in intentional causal agency of emergent structurata, codetermining a concrete singularity which, as has already been noted, takes itself as its only real subject.